UK retail property doyen Barrott steps down as CEO of Abu Dhabi’s Aldar

first_imgTo access this article REGISTER NOWWould you like print copies, app and digital replica access too? SUBSCRIBE for as little as £5 per week. Would you like to read more?Register for free to finish this article.Sign up now for the following benefits:Four FREE articles of your choice per monthBreaking news, comment and analysis from industry experts as it happensChoose from our portfolio of email newsletterslast_img

Read More →

Bumi Armada orders Pusnes system for Kraken FPSO

first_imgMacGregor, part of Cargotec has won an order from Bumi Armada Berhad, a Malaysia-based international offshore oilfied services provider, to supply a Pusnes offloading system for a floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) conversion project.The Pusnes offloading system will be delivered by March 2015. The order is booked into the second quarter 2014 order intake.“By having Pusnes products in MacGregor’s portfolio, we are able to offer complete mooring and loading systems for floating production units,” says Francis Wong, Vice President, Segment Sales, Offshore.Related: Keppel lands Kraken FPSO dealBumi Armada are using a recently built ice-class tanker for the FPSO conversion, which will take place at Keppel Shipyard Ltd in Singapore. Once completed, FPSO Armada Kraken will have a total storage capacity of 600,000 barrels and will be deployed at the Kraken field located in the UK sector of the North Sea.“Our customer wanted to have an experienced supplier with a good track record of delivering safe and reliable offloading systems for demanding North Sea projects,” adds Erland Berntsen, Sales Manager, Offshore Loading at MacGregor. [mappress]Press Release, July 11, 2014last_img read more

Read More →

OFT’s credibility is in tatters following the failed BA price-fixing trial

first_img Julian Joshua is a cartel specialist partner at Howrey The ignominious collapse last week of the first contested prosecution by the OFT for the cartel offence (section 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002) in the BA ‘Fuel Surcharge’ trial may seem like a farce, until you recall that four entirely innocent defendants had their lives blighted for four years. The OFT wanted the cartel offence, designed to punish individuals who ‘dishonestly’ fixed prices to ‘send a message’. Last week’s debacle certainly sent a message but it wasn’t the one the OFT intended. After the directed verdict of ‘not guilty’, the defendants walked from court with their ‘reputations unsullied’, while the OFT’s credibility is deservedly in tatters. Now locked in an unseemly tiff with Virgin Airlines and threatening to withdraw its whistleblower immunity, the OFT also faces demands from BA to cancel the civil fine it agreed to pay in July 2007. Once the dust has settled, what lessons can be learned? First, justice was a big winner. Defendants charged with the offence in future – if that ever happens – should have no doubt as to the fairness of the judicial process if they go for trial. The ‘undisclosed’ evidence that sunk the prosecution case would probably never have come to light if the defence had not fought tooth and nail at every turn. The OFT must conduct a rigorous self-assessment of its capacity to handle complex trials. How could it have effectively farmed out the crucial task of document disclosure to lawyers representing Virgin, the only other party in the cartel? The OFT’s contacts with its own witnesses were also filtered through batteries of Virgin lawyers. Case selection must be more consistent. Last year the OFT ducked the challenge after widespread bid-rigging was uncovered in the construction industry. A more unsuitable case for the first test run of the cartel offence than BA is hard to imagine. Had they ever been called upon to judge the ‘honesty’ of the accused according to normal moral standards, how would the jurors have viewed the ‘get out of jail free’ card handed to Virgin executives? One can only charitably assume the OFT’s judgment was clouded by the prospect of BA scalps and what it likes to call a ‘high impact outcome’. The OFT’s leniency programme, which grants blanket immunity to self-confessed criminals, needs urgent review. How can the prosecution rely as witnesses of the truth on those who have had to admit they were dishonest themselves? Leniency makes investigators lazy. More effort should be made to detect cartels by old-fashioned police methods. Cartels always leave a paper trail. Indeed, to get whistleblowers though the door at all, there must be a credible risk of being uncovered by other means, or else everyone will soon work out that if nobody talks, everybody walks. It is also clear that, for the cartel participants themselves, leniency is no panacea. From Virgin’s perspective, what may once have seemed a smart competitive move to ‘rat out’ a rival at no risk to itself – apart from lawyers’ fees – could well turn out to be a spectacular own goal. Not only could it now risk being fined itself for the alleged BA cartel; ironically it now has the finger pointed at it by Cathay Pacific alleging a totally different cartel, albeit one strenuously denied by Virgin. Immunity applications tend to set off a chain reaction, and applicants should be sure they have uncovered all their own exposure before rushing in to denounce a competitor. For its part, BA might regret its hurry to settle with the OFT and admit a civil infringement in 2007. Lawyers in ‘leniency’ cases should not be overawed into thinking that rolling over is the only viable defence strategy. Lastly, the cartel offence itself is in the frame. There is a good case for criminalising cartels, but this was not the way to do it. ‘Dishonesty’, inserted in the act by the OFT to send a ‘seriousness’ message, remains untested before a jury. It may never be. After this fiasco, the offence must be a prime candidate for David Cameron’s ‘bonfire’ of useless legislation. last_img read more

Read More →

Human rights

first_img Carnduff v Rock [2001] All ER (D) 151 (May) considered; Kennedy v United Kingdom (Application No 26839/05) [2010] All ER (D) 224 (May) considered. Decision of Court of Appeal [2010] All ER (D) 08 (May) Reversed. The employee was employed as an immigration officer by the Home Office. In February 2003, he received the necessary security clearance. In August 2006, he was suspended from duty on basic pay, while consideration was given to the withdrawal of his security clearance. In December, his clearance was withdrawn. His internal appeal against that decision was dismissed, and his further appeal to the Security Vetting Appeals Panel was unsuccessful. The background for those decision was the arrest of the employee’s brother and cousin during an investigation into a suspected plot to mount a terrorist attack on transatlantic flights. The employee’s cousin was convicted in 2008 of various offences in relation to that plot. No information suggested that the employee himself had been involved in the terrorism plot. The employee brought a complaint before the employment tribunal alleging that his security clearance as an immigration officer had been withdrawn in circumstances involving direct or indirect discrimination on grounds of race and/or religion, and that that was contrary to the Race Relations Act 1976 (the 1976 Act) and the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/1660 (the 2003 Regulations). He stated at the outset that he had been advised that his suspension and the withdrawal of his security clearance had been because of his perceived association with certain relatives or associates of relatives suspected of association with terrorist activities and the risk of their attempting to exert influence on him to abuse his position. He denied any such association or risk. In July 2007, he provided particulars which alleged, inter alia, that the Home Office had relied upon stereotypical assumptions about him and/or Muslims and/or individuals of Pakistani origin such as susceptibility to undue influence, coercion or ‘brainwashing’ and had indirectly discriminatory security policies, procedures and methods of investigation. The Home Office contended that there had been no such discrimination and that the decisions taken in relation to the respondent had been taken for the purposes of safeguarding national security. Rule 54(2) of Sch 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004, SI 2004/1861 (the 2004 Regulations) provided for the adoption of a closed material procedure if the tribunal so ordered. Schedule 2 provided for the use of special advocates, whose role was to represent a claimant’s interests so far as possible in relation to the aspects closed to him and his representatives. The tribunal made an order for a closed material procedure, directing that the employee and his representatives should be excluded from proceedings when closed evidence or documents were being considered. The employee’s challenge to the tribunal’s order for a closed material procedure was dismissed by the Employment Appeal Tribunal ([2009] All ER (D) 100 (Nov)), and the Court of Appeal, but it was declared that art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights ‘requires [the appellant] to be provided with the allegations being made against him in sufficient detail to enable him to give instructions to his legal team so that those allegations can be challenged effectively’, even if that put the Home Office ‘in the invidious position of having to make difficult decisions about disclosure and whether or how a claim is to be defended’. The Home office appealed to the Supreme Court against the declaration and the respondent cross-appealed against the conclusion that a closed material procedure was permissible. The employee contended that r 54(2) of the 2004 Regulations was contrary to European law and/or the European Convention on Human Rights. He submitted that it was in conflict with European Legal Principles governing discrimination, contained in the European Treaties and in the Race and Employment Directives, to which the 1996 Act, the Race Relations Act 1976 and the Employment Equality Regulations all had to be read, at least as far as possible, as being subject. The appeal would be allowed (Lord Kerr dissenting). The cross-appeal would be dismissed. (1) The demands of national security might necessitate and under European convention law justify a system for handling and determining complaints under which an applicant was, for reasons of national security, unable to know the secret material by reference to which his or her complaint was determined. The critical questions under the convention were whether the system was necessary and whether it contained sufficient safeguards. However, subject to satisfactory answers on those questions, national security considerations might justify a closed material procedure, closed evidence and, furthermore, a blanket decision leaving the precise basis of the determination unclear (see [36] of the judgment). The legitimacy of closed hearings and of the use of a special advocate were matters of procedural law. Procedure was primarily a matter for national law. It was, however, a basic principle of European Union law that national law should provide effective legal protection, by establishing a system of legal remedies and procedures which ensured respect for the relevant right. The question was whether the closed material procedure authorised by United Kingdom law provided effective legal protection, by establishing a system of legal remedies and procedures to ensure respect for the relevant rights conferred by the 1976 Act and the 2003 Regulations in implementation of the United Kingdom’s obligations under the two directives. The principles of European law which arose for consideration in the instant case were clear. In particular, there had to be effective legal protection in respect of the rights not be discriminated against which the respondent had invoked, and, so far as guidance was necessary, it was to be found for the relevant purposes in the European Convention on Human Rights and the case law of the European Court of Rights. The principles which the European Court of Human Rights would apply in the area of national security had been confirmed by the decision in Kennedy v United Kingdom ([2010] All ER (D) 224 (May)). In the circumstances, the use of a closed material procedure before the tribunal had been lawful (see [15], [18], [61] of the judgment). Accordingly, the cross appeal would be dismissed (see [62] of the judgment). Robin Allen QC and Paul Troop (instructed by Russell Jones & Walker) Solicitors for the employee. James Eadie QC and Catherine Callaghan (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Home Office. Kennedy v United Kingdom (Application No 26839/05) [2010] All ER (D) 224 (May) applied; Esbester v United Kingdom (Application 18601/91) 18 EHRR CD 72 considered; Leander v Sweden (Application 9248/81) 9 EHRR 433 considered; Unibet (London) Ltd v Justitiekanslern: C-432/05 [2007] All ER (D) 217 (Mar) applied. (2) The question was whether there was in the convention, as explained by the European Court of Human Rights, any absolute requirement that a claimant should be able to see the allegations against him in sufficient detail to give instructions to his legal team to enable the allegations to be challenged effectively. Clearly, it was a very significant inroad into conventional judicial procedure to hold a closed material procedure admissible, if it would lead to a claimant not knowing of such allegations in such detail. It was an inroad which should only ever be contemplated or permitted by a court, if satisfied after inspection and full consideration of the relevant material as well as after hearing the submissions of the special advocate, that it was essential in the particular case. However, in light of the clear line of jurisprudence culminating in the decision in Kennedy v United Kingdom ([2010] All ER (D) 224 (May)), to say that it was not possible under the convention as interpreted by the Court in Strasbourg was impossible (see [67]-[69] of the judgment). Accordingly, the appeal would be allowed (see [69] of the judgment). center_img Home Office v Tariq: Supreme Court (Lords Phillips P, Hope DP, Rodger, Brown, Mance, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Lady Hale): 13 July 2011 Right to a fair hearing – Employment proceedingslast_img read more

Read More →

We also need to engage the youth

first_imgMark R H Kleinschmidt, DA Proportional Representative councillor, KenwynMy 8-year-old grandson asked me what one says to another in acknow-ledging June 1. It was a bit of a tough one for me and I thought long and hard before answering him.Nowadays, our children and pupils in particular are extremely knowledgeable through their access to the internet, and Google is a tool which answers practically all questions.A quick answer for my enquiring minded grandson, would have been, wishing the person “Happy June”, but that would not appease him. I deliberated instead with, “Happy Youth Month”, which led to a further barrage of questions from his enquiring appetite.The moral of the aforesaid exchange tells us that while it is noble to acknowledge youth during June, that it is vitally important to engage and ensure that young and old alike assimilate the significance and meaning of Youth Month. It is not enough to merely have celebratory concerts and the ilk. Youth Month holds much significance for each of us individually and as a nation as we reflect on the events leading up to June 16, 1976, and it must be commemorated and embraced as such. Herein lies our true freedom from apartheid and the chains which separated us. Happy Youth Month.last_img read more

Read More →

Navajo Nation sues feds over massive 2015 mine waste spill

first_img Published: August 16, 2016 1:43 PM EDT Updated: August 17, 2016 12:40 PM EDT Do you see a typo or an error? Let us know. Navajo Nation sues feds over massive 2015 mine waste spill Leaders of one of the nation’s largest American Indian tribes blasted the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as their attorneys sued Tuesday, claiming negligence in the cleanup of a massive mine waste spill that tainted rivers in three Western states.Navajo Nation President Russell Begaye stood on the bank of the San Juan River in northwestern New Mexico and explained his people’s link to the water and the economic, cultural and psychological damage inflicted in the wake of the August 2015 spill in southwestern Colorado.“EPA, we’re holding your feet to the fire,” Begaye said, promising that generations of Navajos are willing to fight. “We will not let you get away with this because you have caused great damage to our people, our river, our lifeblood.”A federal contractor triggered the spill during preliminary cleanup work at a mine near Silverton, Colorado. Three million gallons of wastewater carrying arsenic, lead and other heavy metals contaminated rivers in Colorado, New Mexico and Utah.Communities downstream were forced to temporarily halt drawing water from the Animas and San Juan rivers for drinking water and irrigation.Officials have estimated some 880,000 pounds of metals poured into the rivers. Navajos and others are concerned the contamination that has settled in the riverbeds and banks is getting stirred up each time storm runoff courses downstream.The EPA has taken responsibility for cleaning up the spill, but a spokeswoman said Tuesday that the agency will not comment on pending litigation.The Navajo Nation joins New Mexico in pursuing legal action over the spill. The state sued the EPA and Colorado earlier this year, citing environmental and economic damage.Tribal officials at the news conference and in the lawsuit pointed to delays and resistance by the EPA, saying the agency has failed to compensate Navajos for their losses or provide any meaningful recovery efforts over the past year.The EPA has dedicated more than $29 million to respond to the spill and for monitoring, but much of that is going toward stabilization and ongoing drainage at the mine. Reimbursement of state, local and tribal costs is underway, but the tribe has received only a fraction of the nearly $1.6 million doled out to all the parties.Begaye said Navajo farmers have felt the brunt of the spill. Some crops went unplanted this year and cultural practices such as the gathering of corn pollen were skipped.“We have seen the tears. We’ve heard the cries. We’ve heard the anger, the anguish, the loss of trust,” Begaye said.He called the actions of the agency, its contractor and the mining companies reckless and reiterated his disappointment that Navajos have yet to receive a phone call or letter of apology from President Barack Obama.Navajo officials said the government has denied repeated requests for everything from compensation for farmers to resources for long-term monitoring and an onsite laboratory for real-time testing of the river.“They have not done a thing,” Begaye said during his impassioned address.While the lawsuit doesn’t include an exact dollar figure for damages the tribe is seeking, Begaye said Navajos are owed “millions” and that the scope of the contamination is still unknown.A criminal investigation into the spill is being conducted by the EPA’s Office of Inspector General and the U.S. Justice Department, but it’s unclear how long that probe could take.Several members of Congress had pressed for an investigation into the EPA’s role in causing the disaster. SHARElast_img read more

Read More →

It’s April now. How are our fitness goals?

first_imgWE’RE on the fourth month of the year. Had we been religiously following our fitness “resolutions”? We could be daring and flaunting our swimsuit-ready bodies, Boracay Island closure notwithstanding. But like all promises, most are predestined to be broken. Instead of hitting the gyms and lifting weights, we sit at bars and coffee shops, lifting mugs of beer and cups of coffee.As always, when January comes, there is this excitement about getting rid of all the excess poundage on our bodies and, hopefully, becoming the sex symbols we always desired. But after Sinulog, Ati-Atihan and Dinagyang, with all the celebration, food and booze, the dream of the super bod hibernates – and then, there’s always next year.More than half of the people who get in exercise programs quit within the year, according to an article on Men’s Health magazine.Someone said that “motivation is what keeps you going.” Obviously most of us, me included, have to get acquainted with this thing and the lack of it is the major culprit. We all know the benefits of getting fit but we don’t have the will to sustain it. The average person exercises about 115 days a year. It might sound impressive but it is only twice a week. The same article said that 70 percent of men interviewed considered themselves fit, but upon further testing, only about 15 percent were really fit.We all have the best intentions, the best gyms, the best programs, maybe the best outfits, but if we lack the determination and motivation, what we’re doing is an exercise in futility. Fitness experts say we tend to lose interest because we’re doing it because we think we must, not because we like or enjoy it.The “no pain, no gain” mantra might not be applicable to beginners. If it hurts, discomfort follows, so why push it? It is natural to stop if we’re uncomfortable with it and don’t like it already. There are days that we don’t feel like doing it but are forced to do so because of the monthly gym fees and, to some, added expenses for personalised instructions. We’re just going through the motions, not enjoying it. But if we enjoy what we’re doing, we look forward to the next session – and, maybe, that attractive someone on the treadmill.For us to like and stick to our routines, fitness researchers developed SDT – self-determination theory, and they shared three things to get us motivated:* Autonomy. Nobody else made the choice but you. There’s no one else to blame but you if things don’t prosper according to plans.* Competence. You have actual or have a working knowledge of what you have started and had gotten better doing it.* Relatedness. The activity connects you to someone close.It’s when you feel like just lazing around the house watching a new Korean telenovela and your spouse magically appears clad in exercise outfits and asks you to run around the track oval together. You gladly come along because you also like and enjoy running. This is autonomy, competence and relatedness in high definition.We’re not getting any younger and those of you who belong to my age group – growing up with the music of The Beatles, Santana, Spyro Gyra, Earth, Wind and Fire and the like – our knees, ankles, shoulders, and elbows have become lounge areas for this thing called arthritis, and it is achingly annoying. We need the will and determination to prevent these unwanted tenants who make our joints their hangouts.We could have all those fancy exercise equipment at our disposal but if we don’t enjoy it and don’t base our activities on the SDTs, we could be joining the statistics that says more than 45 percent of men use their fitness equipment as something to hang their clothes on. So, whatever happened to good, old and cheap plastic hangers?/PNlast_img read more

Read More →

Could Markieff Morris Be the Missing Link to a Cavs’ Championship? The Pros and Cons of Trading for the Power Forward from Phoenix

first_img Matt Medley Matt Medley is co-editor at NEO Sports Insiders, covers the Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Indians and high school sports in Northeast Ohio.Follow @MedleyHoops on Twitter for live updates from games. The Cavaliers are a team with some searching to do after being blown out by the same team that popped champagne in their building in June. It’s not just that they lost by more than 30 points Monday against the Warriors, but they had ALL of the last six months to hear about “what if the Cavs had been healthy?” “What if What if What if?” Personally, the what if’s grew old after the first time they lost to the Warriors on Christmas Day, but I could at least listen to the argument that Kyrie Irving was not at full strength yet on Christmas, and the Cavs kept it close. Head Coach David Blatt said he is responsible for the team not being “mentally ready” for the January 18th matchup in Cleveland.But when your team and the entire rest of the world who watches basketball has been waiting for a specific game to happen for over six months, HOW IS YOUR TEAM NOT MENTALLY READY?It falls on Blatt. It falls on LeBron James. It falls on the two members of the “Big Three,” Irving and Kevin Love, who made as much of an impact on Monday as they did when they were injured watching from the bench in the Finals. The only difference was on Monday they hurt the team on defense and looked like fools until the Warriors mercifully pulled their starters from the game, and Blatt looked up into the air with disbelief just like 19,000 plus Cavs fans had all night. If you read yesterday’s edition of “Write Down Euclid”, the two players that give the Cavaliers matchup headaches in my opinion are Draymond Green of the Warriors and David West of the San Antonio Spurs. The player that should be accounted for most of those two is Green. If fans in Cleveland can take off their wine and gold colored glasses, and listen to what objective reporters around the league are saying about Green this season, do not be surprised when Green’s name is mentioned in the MVP race and he receives multiple votes at the end of the season.There is a strong case to be made that Green is the engine that makes everything else go for the Warriors. 15 points, 9.5 rebounds, and 7.5 assists per game is impressive enough, but the sentiment that he has been the “heartbeat” of the team the last two seasons makes him much more than just a trash-talker. The one common thread between Green and West, who are dangerous players to watch if the Cavs don’t come up with an answer, is that they are primarily defended by Love. It’s been a rough month and a half for Love on both sides of the ball, and for the most part it’s been a rough seven seasons on defense. If the Cavs continue to expect Love to carry that load on defense and don’t make a change, they are taking a calculated risk with as much evidence as one would need at hand, to bet on a guy who is simply not worth betting on when it comes to defense. Which leads us to a possible answer for the Cavs’ dilemma. Yesterday we laid out the biggest problem. Today, we take a look at who could be the missing piece in the puzzle of solving a 52-year championship drought in Cleveland.He may not be the first name that comes to mind when you think of “game-changing” players, but neither were Iman Shumpert and J.R. Smith when the Cavs traded for them last season. Now, a name that has been circulating in trade rumors for months, appears like it could provide something that is missing in Cleveland. That player is Markieff Morris. Let’s be clear in acknowledging that he is not a perfect player. There is a reason the Phoenix Suns would be willing to trade him. There is a reason the Cavs have enough pieces to acquire him without giving up any essential talent on their roster. But Cleveland could be a great fit for him. And as of right now, it’s not any more of a gamble than telling Love to suit up and get burned by Green. Let’s analyze the pros and cons of the Cavaliers trading for Morris. (Continue to Next Page) Pages: 1 2 3 4 Related TopicsCavsDraymond GreenKevin LoveKlay ThomsponKyrie IrvingLebron JamesMarkieff MorrisNBASpursSteph CurryTrade RumorsWarriorslast_img read more

Read More →

The Best Soccer Players to Ever Come out of Cleveland

first_imgAfter the Cavs recent success in winning the Playoffs and Stipe Miocic claiming the UFC Heavyweight title beating Brazilian Fabricio Werdum within one round, the city of Cleveland has a lot to celebrate. While the aforementioned achievements certainly rank among our state’s most recent successes, this article will look at an often-ignored sporting landscape. With only one active soccer team in the state in the form of AFC Cleveland in the National Premier Soccer League, the spotlight is rarely shone on this particular sport. So, while many may feel that our state doesn’t have many notable stars in the sport, let’s debunk that myth and look at some of the most famous current pros. Justin MorrowFull back Justin Morrow currently turns out for MLS team Toronto FC, and has over 90 first team appearances for the Reds. He’s also had spells in Tampa, Chicago and San Jose. His most impressive achievement to date is appearing for the national team against Canada in 2013. However, this would be the only time the 28-year-old would play for the United States. In the World Cup Qualifiers, Morrow would sit on the bench but didn’t get the chance to come on. Matthew LampsonMatthew Lampson had been a backup keeper for much of his career. Having made 16 appearances across three seasons for Columbus Crew, he then went out on loan to Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Charlotte Independence in 2015 making a handful of appearances for both.In 2016, Lampson would move to Chicago Fire where he has finally cemented his place as a first choice. It marked a long road for the 27-year-old, as he’s face quite a lot of adversity in his life. At 17, Lampson was diagnosed with Stage 4B Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which he went on to beat. Now the keeper “invites a young cancer patient to be the guest of his foundation,” according to the Chicago Tribune because he can relate to what they are going through. Evan BushLast season, the 30-year-old was a standout performer for Montreal Impact and the team’s #1 goalie. This year, it’s been much of the same for the Cleveland-native. The Impact will be looking to exceed last season’s Eastern Conference Quarterfinals exit. And with regular frontman Didier Drogba still banging in the goals at 38, most would think that would be a possible outcome. However, MLS correspondent Paul Robinson who regularly covers the league for sports betting website Betfair suggests the Impact just don’t win enough games” to be considered as a major threat in the Playoffs. Chris KorbDefender Chris Korb started out his collegiate career at Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio where he was the co-captain of the soccer team. From there he went to play for Cleveland Internationals between 2006-2009 where he would clock up 32 games.In 2011, Korb would make the big jump to the MLS with DC United and is still there to this day. He’s made over 100 appearances for the team, but it hasn’t all been plain sailing as the defender suffered an ACL injury in 2015, according to ESPN. Josh WilliamsBorn in Copley, Ohio, Josh Williams attended Cleveland University where he would go on to represent the Cleveland State Vikings between 2006-2009. He would then join the Cleveland Internationals in 2007. He made the transition to the MLS in 2010 where he would spend 4 years with the Columbus Crew appearing 71 times and then went on to play for New York City – he and currently plays for Toronto FC with the aforementioned Justin Morrow. Unfortunately, Williams will always be remembered for testing positive for a performance-enhancing drug in 2011.Image credit: alcheron.com Sujeet Related Topicslast_img read more

Read More →